Subject: Re: Ross Institute: COINTELPRO or Agent of Mossad?
From: John Doe
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:07:11 EST
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 03:07:11 GMT
Out of curiousity I am wondering whether you are a new spammer
here or just changed identities.
firstname.lastname@example.org (Arther Miller) wrote
> From: email@example.com (Arther Miller)
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.org.cia,alt.politics.org.fbi,alt.politics.org.nsa,alt.politics.usa
> Subject: Ross Institute: COINTELPRO or Agent of Mossad?
> Date: 28 Oct 2003 18:54:20 -0800
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 126.96.36.199
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 02:54:20 +0000 (UTC)
> Ross Institute: COINTELPRO or Agent of Mossad?
> July 14, 2003: Over the past few months as the QFS network of
> journalists and researchers have been collecting data to better
> understand the nature of the present state of our world and our proper
> response to it, we have uncovered some extremely troubling facts. We
> thought we had plumbed the depths of the lies of this world, but we
> were wrong. There is more and it is ugly and frightening.
> We are presently at work assembling much of this data (and remember,
> we refer to "data" as hard facts, not assumption or subjective
> opinions). At present, we have released some of the information on the
> website here, including MOSSAD and Moving Companies, the MOSSAD Happy
> Dance and Independence Day. How all of these issues connect together
> will be fully explored in Volume II of Ancient Science . I want to
> state, at this point, that in no way are our remarks to be construed
> as "anti-semitic," though the reader will discover below that they
> WILL be so labeled, and WHY.
> Note this: our commentary in no way should be construed as directed at
> the majority of Jewish people just as our commentary about George Bush
> should in no way be construed as directed at the majority of the
> American people. The only problem we see is that when people do not
> have the FACTS, they will follow leaders who do NOT have their best
> interests at heart, and so it has been throughout history. We would
> wish to promote Unity in Diversity, and to honor ALL peoples,
> philosophies and faiths and to have the same Courtesy afforded toward
> us. That is, after all, the "Democratic Way."