Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:39:36 GMT
Subject: Does the Shame of Belleville know that such an accusation is against his TOS? Re: Does Roger Approve of Downloading CHILD PORN From The Internet? His Friends Do!
References: <email@example.com> <10624-40052F47firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be George Haskell wrote
in message :
>>>>Can't refute what was posted, so you resort to personal attacks, huh,
>>>He's the one who admitted to being a nut case so how is it I personally attacked
>>>him for showing what he has freely admitted about his mental state?
>>I see we still need to work on that whole "on-topic" concept. What
>>possible bearing would what you claim have on what he posted, even if
>>your ironic slur about "nut case" were true.
>The answer should be self evident even for a hard head such as you!
IOW, you cannot say what possible bearing it would have on the topic
Michael was discussing.
>BTW Michael Ragland admitted to downloading "child porn" too which is a federal
>crime and he tried to justify it with his words: ""David Michael states I've
>exchanged, purchased, distributed, and produced child pornography. When I state
>I haven't he declares, "Yes, you have." Apparently, Mr. Michael thinks having
>viewed child pornography automatically means one exchanged, purchased,
>distributed, and produced child pornography. Whoever is familiar with
>alt.binaries on usenet is aware an individual can download an image without
>paying a cent for it. That's very different from ordering child porn over the
>IOW Ragland thinks because he downloaded it for free then it is Okay seeing how
>he didn't have to pay for it!! What have you to say about your fellow kook now
>Roger and mind you your pal Ken McVay has obviously done the same thing too
>seeing how he has stated:
What, exactly, makes him my "fellow kook" or McVay "my pal?"
And after all these years are you *still* ignorant of the difference
between photos of naked children and child porn?
>>>At least he is honest about being mentally ill whereas you and your fellow
>>>filth think you're normal!
>>Of course, the Shame of Belleville never uses personal attacks...
>HE IS MENTALY ILL AND HE WAS THE ONE WHO TOLD US!! HOW IS IT A PERSONAL ATTACK
>POSTING HIS OWN CONFESSORY STATEMENTS TO THAT EFFECT?
Because it is off topic and had nothing whatever to do with the thread
you interrupted with your slurs.