The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most ISP NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Subject: Re: Cuba Travel Advisory from the Wall Street Journal
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:47:55 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 20:47:55 MET DST
Organization: Telenet Internet
"Dan Christensen" wrote in message
> "PL" wrote in message
> > "Dan Christensen" wrote in message
> > news:Qtd89.8832$H67.firstname.lastname@example.org...
> > > Urban,
> > >
> > > Unlike you, I don't just make up stuff as I go.
> > Yes you do.
> > For months after the boycott exempted foodstuffs you claimed it was
> > iumpossible for Cuba to buy US foods.
> US farm and business groups seem to think there is still an embargo
> on. (snip)
Note that most pres info talks of increasing sales.
> > > Time and again you
> > > have been caught with your propaganda pants down.
> > Nope.
> > You are the "great un-panted one".
> > Your blatant lies, misrepresentations and misleading "post-editing"
> > have all been exposed here.
> No, that was just your ignorance of the English language.
Get real you idiot.
What a stupid remark.
> > Unlike you Urban knows Cuba. He also speaks the language, you don't.
> He is still has a problem sorting out the truth--to say the least.
he has a clear view of Cuban reality which - of course - contradicts your
> > > Everything at my website and most of my postings at SCC are based
> > > independent or reliable sources.
> > Nice twist "most of my postings". You have at least given up the
> > pretence that the sources for your postings are mostly nothing else
> > the mere propaganda.
> > On your website you use "snippets" from "selected sources" ignoring
> > (and often misrepresenting) the large body of evidence that
> > contradicts your lies and misrepresentations.
> > The example of your misrepresentation of Elizardo Sanchez's views on
> > the US trade boycott (the ommission of an interview where he
> > the dual process of ending the boycott gradually as human rights and
> > democracy return to Cuba) is just one of them.
> This is, in fact a perfect example of how YOU lie and mislead with
> your selective editing. (See other postings today on Sanchez.)
I quote the direct words and give references.
You use snippets (often altered).
> > Only one report of a human righst organization is mentioned (Amnesty
> > International) while you scare from posting even links to relevant
> > reports from HRW, Pax Christi, ...
> > > Whenever possible, I give direct
> > > links to online sources.
> > You mean: when it suits you you give links.
> > Often enough I have had to find the articles myslef or ask you for a
> > link.
> > Often the review of the article (that I than posted in full) has
> > exposed your misrepresentations.
> Yeah, right! The kettle calling the teapot black.
> > > You, on the other hand, cannot at times even
> > > keep your story straight with your fellow counterrevolutionaries!
> > Unlike you, Urban has a true and correct view of the situation in
> > and can speak from personal experience.
> Why doesn't he tell the truth then? Why, for example, doesn't he come
> clean on this funeral in Santiago? Why doesn't he at least admit he
> could be wrong, especially since his fellow counterrevolutionary
> reported key facts that contradict his own?
Get real, Dan.
For someone who lies all the times you are a nitpicker for semantics.
> > He has access to the large body of articles in Spanish. You "oh
> > Cuba expert" don't even speak Spanish. As such you have access to
> > a small subset of data.
> Enough, it seems, to expose YOUR lies and disinformation.
Quote a lie.
Show a misrepresentation.
As someone who argues against the explicit words of someone like Sanchez you
have a lot of nerve.
> > You don't deal in honest information, but mere propaganda.
> > In the past you have even denied the facts that I posted from the
> > Notimex press agancy while admiiting later that you had
> > all along from Granma (WFP project in Santiago).
> Bullshit. That whole issue blew up in your face--remember? (snip)
Nope. It didn't.
Do you deny that you attacked my posting while afterwards admitting that
Granma had already given the same information?
> > Whenever faults Urban may have (like all of us), he is genuinely
> > concerned for the well-being of the Cuban people. He puts respect of
> > human rights of all before politics, unlike you.
> He certainly doesn't seem to put the TRUTH before politics.
Nope, Dan, you put dogma before truth.
Urban puts people before dogma.
> > You have admitted here in SCC that you could not deny that you did
> > your "(communist) cause" above the well-being and lives of the Cuban
> > people.
> That's bullshit.
Should I quote you?
> > You have supported the human rights abuse and extra judicial
> > of the regime while advocating even more extreme measures.
> Haven't you been burned enough times on this issue? ((snip)
Quote yourself on:
1. the shooting down of the two planes over international waters
2. the deaths of children in the tugboat 13 de Marzo
3. the abuse of human rights
4. the use of death squads.
If you don't; I will.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of