The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most ISP NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: lparker@NOSPAM.emory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
Subject: Re: [NEWS]: Probe: U.S. Knew of Jet Terror Plots
Date: 24 Sep 2002 17:11:42 GMT
Organization: Emory University
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Sep 2002 17:11:42 GMT
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Fred J. McCall wrote:
>lparker@NOSPAM.emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
>:In article ,
>: Fred J. McCall wrote:
>:>lparker@NOSPAM.emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
>:>:In article <email@example.com>,
>:>: Fred J. McCall wrote:
>:>:>lparker@NOSPAM.emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
>:>:>:In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>:>:>: Fred J. McCall wrote:
>:>:>:>lparker@NOSPAM.emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
>:>:>:>:The liberal media that hounded Clinton for 8 years but let
>:>:>:>:free pass about his National Guard record, his war mongering,
>:>:>:>:record as governor?
>:>:>:>What's wrong with his National Guard record, Lloyd?
>:>:>:1. How many people got to join ahead of others on a waiting
>:>:>:2. How many in the NG got a transfer to another state so they
>:>:>:work on a political campaign?
>:>:>:3. How many people in the NG were allowed to not report in for a
>:>:>All been hashed over so many times that it's old news. No matter
>:>:>hard you leftists try to stir this particular pot, nobody cares.
>:>:As long as you Clinton-haters still regurgitate old lies, I will
>:>:continue to remind you of the truth about Bush.
>:>Nobody has to LIE about Clinton. There are so many TRUTHS that
>:>is ever going to run out.
>:>Yes, Lloyd. You and Hillary are no doubt sure that all Bill's
>:>problems are fabrications by the Vast Anti-Arkansas Right Wing
>:>Conspiracy. It was a great defense right up until the FBI analyzed
>:>the cum-stained dress. Suddenly Bill was willing to talk. He
>:>willing to tell the truth, but he was willing to talk.
>:Want to talk about White Water? Vince Foster? FBI files? Travel
>:office? All investigated, no evidence found of any wrong-doing by
>Uh, that wasn't QUITE what the finding was, as I recall it. It's
>certainly the spin that Democrats want to give it, though. The
>finding I recall was something along the lines of "there is evidence
>of wrongdoing, but insufficient evidence to warrant prosecution".
>That's just a LITTLE different from "no evidence".
Those are your words. The special prosecutors (all 3 of them)
have said they found NO evidence of wrong-doing.
>:Who's investigating Cheney and Haliburton? If not for the lawsuit,
>:nobody would find out anything.
>The FTC, I assume.
>:Who's investigating Bush and Enron?
>:Bush and Harken Oil?
>Nothing there to investigate.
There's as much as there was about Whitewater at the beginning.
>What's to investigate over Bush and
>Enron? That he got campaign funds from them? If that's your issue,
>better lock up most of Congress, including most of the Democrats.
That he let them write his energy policy, that the GOP pushed through
energy futures deregulation...
>That they were in the loop on some environmental regulation and such?
>Better lock up Clinton, too, if that's your issue.
>Bush and Harken Oil has been done to death years ago. You think
>there's something there other than some late filings that were
>investigated YEARS ago? Want to enlighten us all as to what you
>that is, precisely?
That's it -- we don't know, any more than we did about Whitewater at
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of