From: Jim Alder
Subject: Re: New Homeland Security Mottos?
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:04:47 -0000
Organization: Your Company
References: wrote in
> Is it my fault if you're too lazy and ignorant to read my posts? I
> think not.
No, it's your fault that your posts are too ignorant to be worth
reading. And yes, we know you 'think not.'
> Not that your ignorant diatribe against me deserves a response, but a
> wise man once said I should be able to suffer fools more gladly. I
> guess this is case in point, fool:
Heh heh. You could do so better by answering the questions I posted to
you, rather than delete everything and call them ad hominem.
> Last time I checked this was still a free country. Ordinary citizens
> could change things they did not like by getting involved, and that's
> what I'm advocating. If you don't like something - -and you claim you
> don't - - then get up off your large bottom, put down the coke, nachos
> and PS2 and do something about it. Join the EFF, the ACLU, or whatever
> organization your political persuasion supports. Write letters to your
> Congressman and Senators, engagae in public discourse.....do something!
> That's all I'm saying. I don't profess to have all the answers.
That's good. I don't see that you have any. Oh, you think you know the
size of my ass, and my eating habits, apparently. Oh, and you're familiar
with the term 'ad hominem' but you don't seem to have a problem using them.
> And no, I don't hate the American people. Nice of you to sieze on my
> comments on the Democratic party and instantly construct the delusion
> that I actually hate people! Maybe it's time for your next shot of
> Thorazine: shall I call the nurse?
Ah, and now you have my medical history as well? Wouldn't it have been
easier to just answer my questions. You said you hate the Republicans and
the Democrats too.
> What I said was that I intensely dislike people who slavishly follow
No, you didn't. You said you "hate the Dems, too." Now you want to lie
about it as if no one can look back once you've snipped it?
> Notice my dislike of you: a slavish Republican toady if ever
> there was one. And I think both parties are pretty rotten too.
Every quiz I've ever taken along those lines puts me as a hardcore
libertarian. So I guess you dislike me because you're a hatemongering
> And watch who you call a hatemongering a**hole. It's you and not me
> who is using obscenities. Unlike you, I have a sufficient command of
> the English language that I need not resort to calling people d***heads
> and a**holes.
One doesn't need profanity to be a hatemongering asshole.
> Perhaps your post should have said that you refuse to engage in
> discourse with those who differ from you in political persuasion?
I do it all the time.
> Or that you refuse to engage people like me who are so clearly
> your intellectual superior in every conceivable way??
Hee hee hee. Good one! Oh, you were serious?
> Go ahead...heap invective on me. It's about all your brain can handle.
>> > "Jim Alder" wrote in message
I'd think such an egghead could handle the questions.
Congress is so strange. A man gets up to speak and says nothing. Nobody
listens - and then everybody disagrees. ~Boris Marshalov