From: "Dan Christensen"
Subject: Re: Cuba Travel Advisory from the Wall Street Journal
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:46:16 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 23:47:26 EDT
Organization: AT&T Canada IES
"Urban Domeij" wrote in message
> "Dan Christensen" wrote in message
> > "Urban Domeij" wrote in message
> > news:email@example.com...
> > > "Dan Christensen" wrote in message
> > news:<6Mk89.8859$H67.firstname.lastname@example.org>...
> > > > "Urban Domeij" wrote in message
> > > > news:email@example.com...
> > > > > "Dan Christensen" wrote in message
> > > > news:...
> > /.../
> > > > > > You, on the other hand, cannot at times even keep your
> > > > > > straight with your fellow counterrevolutionaries!
> > > > > > (See, for example, the thread "Santiago" at the SCC
> > > > >
> > > > > Dan Christensen has tried this scam in here for over a year
> > > > > See above how he suggests that free people should use the
> > > > > collusion tactics as his criminal friends do in order to
> > > > > their untrue stories look more credible.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, he has failed to prove his claims that I or the
> > > > > independent journalist should have been lying. Both tell
> > > > > the same story from different angles.
> > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > Both tell contradictory versions of alleged events at a
> > > > Santiago de Cuba. One or both of them is lying. Judge for
> > yourself.
> > >
> > > As can be seen above, Dan Christensen suggests collusion as a
> > > to make stories look more credible. It is the tactic he uses
> > > when facts not fit his political agenda or his damage control
> > actions.
> > >
> > > He seems unable to realize, that collusion is out of the
> > > for sincere and honest people. What he actually suggests is that
> > > he expects his opponents to use the same dishonest tactics as he
> > > uses himself.
> > >
> > Forget the diversions, Urban. The fact remains that your stories
> > contradict one another. One or both of you is lying. Readers can
> > for themselves.
> > Dan
> Not at all. There is no contradiction between the two accounts,
> but there is one Dan Christensen, who never was there, who claims,
> that the funeral guests wanted to "politicize" the funeral, and
> that they should have provoked the police.
> However, Christensen has failed to explain what a political
> police is doing at a funeral, and why the police, military
> and paramilitary groups attacked funeral guests with sticks,
> stones and truncheons. Those Christensenian villains beat up
> elderly people and children. Christensen condones the actions
> by political police and other hooligans, just as he would do
> whatever they do.
> The person who was to be buried was murdered by Christensen's
> "friends" in a Cuban jail, slowly, by refusing him the medicine
> he needed for his heart condition, even though medicine was
> taken to the jail by his wife. Marcelo was jailed two years ago
> for no reason at all, and he was held without trial till he died.
> Such is Christensen's ideal state.
We have been over this in detail at the thread "Santiago." If anyone
cares to know the truth, they should look it up at the SCC
archives--it does go on.
(Visit my website at http://www.netcom.ca/~dchris/CubaFAQ.html )