From: Fred J. McCall
Subject: Re: [NEWS]: Probe: U.S. Knew of Jet Terror Plots
Organization: is for people who don't have real work to do
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 20:32:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 13:32:11 PDT
email@example.com (David Thornley) wrote:
:In article ,
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:>:>All been hashed over so many times that it's old news. No matter how
:>:>hard you leftists try to stir this particular pot, nobody cares.
:>:As long as you Clinton-haters still regurgitate old lies, I will
:>:continue to remind you of the truth about Bush.
:>Nobody has to LIE about Clinton. There are so many TRUTHS that nobody
:>is ever going to run out.
:However, the media was much happier about reporting unpleasant truths
:about Clinton than about Bush.
Not that I've noticed.
:Ever wonder who the civilians were on the Greenville's controls when
:it sunk that Japanese school boat? I'd bet that some, if not all,
:were Bush campaign contributors. I haven't heard a thing about it.
There were no civilians "on the control". There were civilians IN THE
CONTROL ROOM. That's very, very different.
:So why was the media so insistent that the Clintons were renting
:out the White House to contributors and not probing into Bush
:contributors possibly killing people?
Possibly because the media knows it can't fabricate the sort of lie
you just did and get away with it.
:>Yes, Lloyd. You and Hillary are no doubt sure that all Bill's
:>problems are fabrications by the Vast Anti-Arkansas Right Wing
:>Conspiracy. It was a great defense right up until the FBI analyzed
:>the cum-stained dress. Suddenly Bill was willing to talk. He wasn't
:>willing to tell the truth, but he was willing to talk.
:Clinton was certainly not somebody I'd hold up as a role model, but
:that whole thing was blown way out of proportion.
Perjury by a sitting President was "blown way out of proportion"?
Clinton's own wife worked very hard to impeach a President where that
was one of the charges.
:Nor were Clinton's business dealings worse than, say, Cheney's.
Let's wait and see on that one, shall we?
:When we start getting front-page headlines on what Bush did and
:when, then I may start feeling that the media is biased towards
If there was anything they thought would have legs (like the underage
drinking stories about his daughter, for example), they'd be on it
like sharks on chum.
Have you considered that perhaps there is a dearth of reportage "on
what Bush did and when" because there is no evidence that he did
No, I didn't think you had.
You have never lived until you have almost died.
Life has a special meaning that the protected
will never know.