The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most ISP NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Fred J. McCall
Subject: Re: [NEWS]: Probe: U.S. Knew of Jet Terror Plots
Organization: is for people who don't have real work to do
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
:I asked if that was the claim being made one option was
: 1) he committed perjury , but got a plea bargain
Which requires an initial charge, so that's not it.
:> The fact that he was not criminally charged and was instead given "other
:> choices" does not change the fact that he committed a crime.
So for Vince, a murder victim isn't dead until the killer is charged?
My, what a Schroedinger universe he lives in.
:Since you are an attorney, you well understand teh need for materiality. you
:also understand that If the prosecution has the evidence to convict a perosn of
:a crime, they either go forward with a case adn get a convision or they don't .
:it is unethical for a prosecutor to make a unilateral declaration that a pweron
:has committed a crime when there has been no plea or conviction.
:> Oh I am sure that there are those in the current administration guilty of
:> some wrong doing. But like I tell my clients, it doesn't matter what
:> anybody else does, the issue is still whether you did something or not.
:No, actually the issue is whehter they can prove you did it. that is what makes
:a perosn gulty of a crime.
No, that is what makes them CONVICTED of a crime.
:No the answer is the prosecutor ahd an opportunity and all the evidence to
:accuse bill clinton of perjury and declined. It wqas his call and ther eis not
:the slightest evidence that he was corruptly influenced. the Difficulty of
:proving the materiality of the statement or that it was known to be false and
:that the question was asked precisely enouhg to bring the case may have
:inflluenced the the prosecutor. Under your analyssi a peosn can be acquitted of
:the crime and you would still be able to claim they were guilty. Since the
:prosecutor unilaterally controls whehter the case is brought your approach would
Did OJ do it?
"Nekubi o kaite was ikenai"
["It does not do to slit the throat of a sleeping man."]
-- Admiral Yamamoto
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of