The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most ISP NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Subject: Re: [NEWS]: Probe: U.S. Knew of Jet Terror Plots
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:33:47 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:21:45 +0000 (UTC)
In article <3DA0F5F8.92FCA2AA@verizon.net>, Vince Brannigan
>> > I agree with Vince in so far as it takes a court judgement
>> > to decide a crime has been committed but disagree if he
>> > insists that only a trial in a criminal court can decide that.
>> > However its clear that a criminal court has the final
>> > word. Say for example that the coroners court declares
>> > a averdict of unlawful killing, a defendant is arrested and put
>> > on trial and is acquitted on the grounds of self defense.
>> > In that case no crime was committed despite the
>> > finding of the coroners court.
>> > Keith
>> This means the Court made a finding of an individuals legal guilt or lack of
>> proof thereof. It does not alter the facts. I think the main argument has
>> been, the old if a tree falls and no one is there does it make a noise.
>define a noise and you get yoru answer. does it make vibrations inthe eair of
>course. is that the definitiono f a "noise"
>> no one witnesses the event and no court ever has a hearing or trial does it
>> change the fact that a crime occurred. Vince maintains no crime. I maintain
>> a crime occurred for which no conviction was had.
>And your citation for this belief? and how do you dela with a pardon?
Do not many laws start: 'It shall be an offence....'?
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of