The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroups
These Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic, Opinions Or Content Posted To These Or Any Other Newsgroups. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroups And Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Simon Sheppard"
Newsgroups: alt.domain-names.wanted
Subject: Re: Domain name speculators
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 10:11:07 +0100
Message-ID:
References: <20030706213149.23433.00000229@mb-m23.aol.com> <90aa7923.0307062202.69057bd2@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.135.243.250
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jul 2003 09:10:03 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
I wouldn't be too hard on GoDaddy - they're all at it. I actually think
GoDaddy are one of the better (more decent) registrars, although there are a
few deficiencies in their system. The one I couldn't get off fast enough is
Buydomains.
Cheers
SS
Al B. Bock wrote in message
<90aa7923.0307062202.69057bd2@posting.google.com>...
>Was trying to figure out where my association of .ws = website came
>from and, sure enough, this misperception was a result of the way .ws
>is being presented by the company that sold it to me: GoDaddy. At
>their Domain Names search page:
>https://registrar.godaddy.com/default.asp (for some reason can't paste
>link at this forum) on their rate card listed under.ws in parenthesis
>is Web Site. Also if not mistaken, received email from them about this
>hot new .ws (web site) domain. What underhanded deception! My mistake
>for not checking out more thouroughly before shelling out. Good-bye
>GoDaddy, taking my biz and hosting accounts elsewhere-one strike and
>you're out!.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Web Archive Index Of The alt.domain-names.wanted Newsgroup
|